The boss vs. leader debate has been on the rise in the corporate world in recent years, especially in companies that have analyzed employee performance and well-being, in search of a more positive and efficient environment.
The idea of the boss has always been present and, even though many people aspire to this position, he is generally seen as someone who imposes fear. Just imagine any film that features a boss. The most common thing is that it is someone who is out of control, who shouts at everyone and treats the team badly.
Although not every boss is like this, the concept of a leader is counterpointed by observing these weaknesses and transforming the characteristics of the position to be more welcoming to the team. The two representations have similarities, such as making the final decision, directing the team and, often, as the bearer of bad news and comments that are not always easy to hear.
Boss x leader
But it is what makes them different that draws attention, as the leader emerges with a different attitude to deal with pressure, demands for results and support for the team.
It is difficult to abandon some customs, whether due to lack of preparation or lack of preparation to take on the position, we still see many bosses who are difficult to deal with who practice the maxim of “those who can command, obey those who have sense”.
The saying is not famous for nothing, and it serves very well to summarize how this figure behaves and the type of dynamics he imposes on the rest of the company.
On the other hand, we see a movement of change, encouraged by transformations in relationships, the entry of a new generation into the job market and the negative consequences of professional exhaustion.
Previously, the idea of a team led through intimidation and exclusion seemed normal, even though it had negative implications for people and even the company’s results. Today, the idea is to review these attitudes, seeking a more inclusive environment based on good communication and exchange of ideas.
What is the difference between leading and managing?
The simplest way to describe the difference between the two styles is attitude. The boss will say “do it”, while the leader says “let’s do it”. This difference alone implies a more collaborative figure in developing projects and carrying out daily tasks.
This does not mean that the work will not be delegated, but rather that this role will bring collaborative action. Specialist Martha Gabriel pointed out, on her LinkedIn, the main differences between the two:
Boss
- He sends
- Says: I
- Says: go
- Search for culprit
- Inspect
- Demoralizes
Leader
- Eastern
- Says: we
- Say: let’s go
- Follow
- Trust
- Take responsibility
Both are positioned as coordinators or managers of a certain area or company, but what differentiates them are the attitudes that each uses to approach and manage people. Let’s see more about each one below.
How does a boss behave?
According to the logic proposed by Martha, the boss is at the top of the organizational pyramid and looks down on everyone. So, his main attitude is just to say what everyone should do and constantly demand them.
He is not open to ideas, he does not observe the team in search of strengths that can make the work better, nor does he care about monitoring their development. But he supervises, putting extra pressure on people and making them feel insecure and incapable.
How does a leader behave?
The leader’s main role is to inspire people, and he does this by setting an example. His main focus is people, so he takes time to get to know each person and help them develop their strengths.
He demands results, just like the boss, but instead of looking for people to blame, he encourages the team to look for innovative solutions and is prepared to deal with problems instead of passing on difficulties for others to deal with.
From small day-to-day tasks to larger issues, he knows how to listen to what each person has to say and, when he notices productivity problems, for example, he will seek to understand the employee and, together with him, seek solutions.
Why is it better to be a leader?
As we have seen, the personification of the boss is outdated and companies that rely on these figures are unlikely to achieve market leadership or become a reference. Your attitude tends to belittle people, who will not have the confidence necessary to do their best.
The leader, on the contrary, will give space for everyone to have the opportunity to prove themselves and evolve. Check out why to be a leader and not a boss:
More productivity
Being a leader includes transmitting the pressure for results to the team, but in a constructive way, using each person’s skills to increase efficiency. This way, everyone can explore their potential, which will lead to a more productive team.
Creative potential
The boss acts in a way that blocks processes and prevents people from exploring their creative potential. So, even if they have good ideas, they won’t have the space or confidence to put them into practice. As a result, concepts that could speed up work or even promote innovation will not receive due attention, much less investment.
Emergence of new leaders
A good leader is able to motivate people to the point that they also seek leadership positions. With this, they will continue to develop technical and behavioral skills that will allow them to reach this level.